I watched a video some time ago of a 2 year old kid who keeps tapping on a magazine and pushing it around. The kid was clearly confused that the magazine was not really doing anything. It was not moving, there were no funny noises coming out of it. The magazine was not worth paying attention to. "Where's that iPad!"
Kids are surrounded by technology and there is a need to understand that their world is different from ours was when we were their age. It is important to create a learning environment for them that will allow them to express themselves in a better manner.
Mitch Resnick of MIT says that kids should be taught how to code at a young age in his talk. He says that children must learn to code in order to use code to learn.
I have experienced in the past and continue to experience even today that I understand a concept better when I have coded it. This maybe because I spend a long time in trying to split the problem into simple language - essentially into the program's pseudo code. When I taught people to code I often asked them to think of the computer as a stupid machine that needed to be told in an extremely simple manner how to do a task. This enhances the understanding of a particular concept in leaps and bounds.
This of course does not mean that kids begin to be trained as software engineers in kindergarten. Children can be provided with a means for them to express themselves and learn through doing rather than reading textbooks. Honestly, textbooks no longer have an appeal to kids who play with tablets and game stations. I saw some textbooks recently in which there was a lot of colour and figures and even cartoons. Yes, the ones from NCERT that are subject of a lot of controversy. Controversy or not, they are far off from the dull textbooks that I used in school. But they do not do much towards providing interactivity. And this is the point of my argument.
Everything boils down to interactions. What can be lectured about for hours can be demonstrated in 20 minutes and learned through doing in less than that! The easiest way to do this today is through technology. Right?
Translating this to children who do not have access to computers or even a TV is tough. There are three aspects to the problem: (1) introducing rural and urban poor children to technology, (2) encouraging these kids to use technology to learn, (3) to teach children to code so that they can use technology to implement their learning and expand their knowledge further.
Towards the first aspect, some projects have seen small successes with solar powered projectors using cheap parts from used phones, torchlights and computers etc. (low cost and sustainable) and as gadgets get cheaper, people will gain access to them as is seen from the ubiquity of mobile phones today. Again, this projector idea is a means to get information as a sort of virtual teacher across to students. Yet the role of a teacher is beyond providing children with information. The teacher is also someone who evaluates the progress of a child and guides him/her to what he/she should do to improve. The interactive nature of a teacher's presence is absent here.
The second aspect of the problem - the use of technology is still a tricky matter. There have been some examples of cheap used computers being donated to children in rural areas. But with selfish and greedy software manufacturers constantly withdrawing support for primitive software, access to the internet becomes a challenge. There is the issue of lack of electricity in many places, poor internet connections and so on. Of course many more issues to this problem than this simplistic example that I provide.
The third aspect of the problem requires that people work towards creating software and creative solutions that help children learn coding. Scratch is a great idea, but how far it can go for these rural/poor settings where a computer for each kid is still a far cry, is a question. Finally, there is also the question of the use of English on the net and in these kind of software. This can be a serious hurdle for many.
Kids are surrounded by technology and there is a need to understand that their world is different from ours was when we were their age. It is important to create a learning environment for them that will allow them to express themselves in a better manner.
Mitch Resnick of MIT says that kids should be taught how to code at a young age in his talk. He says that children must learn to code in order to use code to learn.
I have experienced in the past and continue to experience even today that I understand a concept better when I have coded it. This maybe because I spend a long time in trying to split the problem into simple language - essentially into the program's pseudo code. When I taught people to code I often asked them to think of the computer as a stupid machine that needed to be told in an extremely simple manner how to do a task. This enhances the understanding of a particular concept in leaps and bounds.
This of course does not mean that kids begin to be trained as software engineers in kindergarten. Children can be provided with a means for them to express themselves and learn through doing rather than reading textbooks. Honestly, textbooks no longer have an appeal to kids who play with tablets and game stations. I saw some textbooks recently in which there was a lot of colour and figures and even cartoons. Yes, the ones from NCERT that are subject of a lot of controversy. Controversy or not, they are far off from the dull textbooks that I used in school. But they do not do much towards providing interactivity. And this is the point of my argument.
Everything boils down to interactions. What can be lectured about for hours can be demonstrated in 20 minutes and learned through doing in less than that! The easiest way to do this today is through technology. Right?
Translating this to children who do not have access to computers or even a TV is tough. There are three aspects to the problem: (1) introducing rural and urban poor children to technology, (2) encouraging these kids to use technology to learn, (3) to teach children to code so that they can use technology to implement their learning and expand their knowledge further.
Towards the first aspect, some projects have seen small successes with solar powered projectors using cheap parts from used phones, torchlights and computers etc. (low cost and sustainable) and as gadgets get cheaper, people will gain access to them as is seen from the ubiquity of mobile phones today. Again, this projector idea is a means to get information as a sort of virtual teacher across to students. Yet the role of a teacher is beyond providing children with information. The teacher is also someone who evaluates the progress of a child and guides him/her to what he/she should do to improve. The interactive nature of a teacher's presence is absent here.
The second aspect of the problem - the use of technology is still a tricky matter. There have been some examples of cheap used computers being donated to children in rural areas. But with selfish and greedy software manufacturers constantly withdrawing support for primitive software, access to the internet becomes a challenge. There is the issue of lack of electricity in many places, poor internet connections and so on. Of course many more issues to this problem than this simplistic example that I provide.
The third aspect of the problem requires that people work towards creating software and creative solutions that help children learn coding. Scratch is a great idea, but how far it can go for these rural/poor settings where a computer for each kid is still a far cry, is a question. Finally, there is also the question of the use of English on the net and in these kind of software. This can be a serious hurdle for many.
No comments:
Post a Comment